I think the same…because I am an employee and employed, I can not constantly check the site 
2 Likes
Whether good or bad is from testnet user perspective, the team is doing this considering long term future of the project. They have their merits
4 Likes
Challenge 4 is targeting high valued community members to reward governance tokens. It is taking the project and the community in a brilliant direction. Can’t wait to see how they can continue the filter process with proof of work challenge 5 series.
6 Likes
Maybe that’s what they want. 
And it’s really not amusing
3 Likes
Right now LV4 just wants to weed out the fake accounts, there are many challenges that are not yet live, I don’t think you guys want the community to be filled with a lot of fake accounts, right? That’s not good for the long run!
5 Likes
The fourth step is good but difficult. The problem was that it could still be a little simpler or not like the discord stage that came with the clutter.
5 Likes
The good or bad of the fourth stage depends on how we look at it. For example, when I can not pass the challenges, it becomes bad and otherwise it becomes good!
3 Likes
its very very bad because to many users can’t did that
2 Likes
Closing this topic, since it is a duplicate of another topic. In the beginning we have to be strict about this to keep the forum clean & usable. Also see forum rules.
Please take the discussion over here: What do you think about the Gyroscope Level 4 games?
Q: What should be posted in the forum?
A: This forum aims to facilitate a streamlined discussion on governance proposals, meta-governance and other issues of general concern to the Gyroscope protocol
Q: What should NOT be posted in the forum?
A: The forum is not intended for casual conversations. If a topic or post is not constructive, a personal question or has already been discussed in another thread it might get deleted or closed.
1 Like