The fourth step. Good or bad?

Do you think that is the way to hold the fourth stage of the profession? Isn’t it better for the fourth stage to be as difficult as the previous stages, but not to cause surprises?

I also agree that it is not good to be unexpected because we are not always ready

the project is but this step 4 take long time and we don’t know much about it. whatever this step is Good or bad, it’s boring and confused us !

i think is very good. verrrrrrrrrrrry goooooooooood

All the steps are very professional and correct. I’m sure it’s good

It’s getting too long
We should not be surprised after all this waiting for us to take part in the challenges

It should also be noted that the steps should not be such that real users of the community can not pass it.

i think this kind of limited in time surprises just make the common members to leave not just multy accounts ! and its the matter of time we(the community) are not from a similar time zone so this kind of surprises makes things difficult.

I completely agree with you. The more we wait for launch, the more people get tired and leaves the project.

I think level 4very difficult and I confuse and I don’t. Know how to work,

i agreed, i wish next challenges be easier and we can do it

All the steps of Challenge 4 were unexpected and no one was able to pass them, I hope the easier steps will be left so that we can participate.

The fourth challenge was a bit difficult
I think next challenge will be easier than this👌

whatever developing team must be aware this is a project that needs community not a comunity that needs project

it is not very well programed but still working

For the mortgage attack and robot attack, the choice of the fourth stage is very correct, but for some challenge tasks, the poap project that ordinary people can participate in should be selected appropriately, otherwise the threshold will be too high and there will be no qualified people.

fully agree with you this challenges make the community exhausted and cause interested people left project

Although it can resist witches, he also rejected most real humans

The team is doing a great jon so far, they know what they are doind

Yeah. sybil resistance it’s to participate in the community. to share your ideas, to support the system and other users, to voluntarily work for the system, to use your expertise and do some required activities to growth the system. these are the “sybil resistance” not these challenges.

I think the same…because I am an employee and employed, I can not constantly check the site

Whether good or bad is from testnet user perspective, the team is doing this considering long term future of the project. They have their merits

Challenge 4 is targeting high valued community members to reward governance tokens. It is taking the project and the community in a brilliant direction. Can’t wait to see how they can continue the filter process with proof of work challenge 5 series.

Maybe that’s what they want. And it’s really not amusing

Right now LV4 just wants to weed out the fake accounts, there are many challenges that are not yet live, I don’t think you guys want the community to be filled with a lot of fake accounts, right? That’s not good for the long run!

The fourth step is good but difficult. The problem was that it could still be a little simpler or not like the discord stage that came with the clutter.

The good or bad of the fourth stage depends on how we look at it. For example, when I can not pass the challenges, it becomes bad and otherwise it becomes good!

its very very bad because to many users can’t did that

Closing this topic, since it is a duplicate of another topic. In the beginning we have to be strict about this to keep the forum clean & usable. Also see forum rules.

Please take the discussion over here: What do you think about the Gyroscope Level 4 games?

Q: What should be posted in the forum?

A: This forum aims to facilitate a streamlined discussion on governance proposals, meta-governance and other issues of general concern to the Gyroscope protocol

Q: What should NOT be posted in the forum?

A: The forum is not intended for casual conversations. If a topic or post is not constructive, a personal question or has already been discussed in another thread it might get deleted or closed.