[Discution before proposal] Give GGU to users who lock their airdrop via "Streaming"

Hello,
First of all, congratulations on the launch of $GYFI, a new milestone for the project.

I’d like to come back to the launch and especially the claim phase:
I have claimed my tokens and locked them in full, however, I was expecting to receive GYFI in the form of veGYFI and participate in the governance of the project and earn part of the fees generated, but this is not the case.

I therefore propose that those who have locked their airdrop, get a portion of GGU to participate in the governance of the project.

Or to migrate the governance operation into the form of “voted escrow token” as Curve etc. has done, and create a “Defi Wars” around GYFI.

Thank you for reading and don’t hesitate to reply, debate and argue with me.

4 Likes

Hello,

I think it would be nice if those locked tokens could be used in some way, that sounds good.

I also like adding GYFI more utility on top of voting.

I’m not sure if now is the right time for this, as I’m not sure how complex and how long this would take to implement, with 3-CLPS and Dynamic Pools being in development right now, which should have more impact for the protocol growth.

Would like to hear teams thoughts on this.

2 Likes

I already informed the team, and it completely makes sense. However, since there is another issue regarding the liquidity depth of the $GYFI token, I am considering writing a proposal to address both issues simultaneously.

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed after 7 days. New replies are no longer allowed.