Gyro is doing a BIG mistake by assigning one percent of the total supply for funding members.
What a joke! soon you will regret it.
1 Like
I canāt Believe gyro team can go wrong till this limit
this proposal in fact is for discord moderators not loyal users
max 1000 token for mods , max 5% for NFT HOLDERs
this would be a good way to appreciate long-term users and loyal ones
3 Likes
its so funny only 1% for nft.average 40 token for nft and 5000 token for mod.we so early on this project and allocation must be change to 5%.if you do it its so fair and we support you again.
2 Likes
hello .
1% token allocation is really unacceptable and terribleā¦
You should value early adopters more, especially after that complicated and difficult testnet that only a few were able to successfully pass.
I think this is unfair. 
If the share for testnet users increases from 1% to 5%, and the tokens allocated to the team are reduced from 5000 to a maximum of 1000 tokens, it would be fair.
1 Like
It is recommended to increase the NFT holder allocation ratio to 5% to recognize the contributions made by early testers to the project
2 Likes
i same thinking better please
After increasing the share of early adopters from 1% to 5%, the NFT rarity will also be a very suitable criterion for distributing GYFI tokens and is considered a fair method.
1 Like
This is very unfair. In My Opinion, The Percentage of the NFT Should 4 %OR 5 %, and 1000 token for the discord mode.
1 Like
If you really want to drive real hype and benefit the community, you should definitely increase the share for early usersāNFT holdersāfrom 1% to 5%.
1 Like
1% token allocation is really unacceptable and terribleā¦
You should value early adopters more, especially after that complicated and difficult testnet that only a few were able to successfully pass.
I never agree with this proposal and I hope this amount increases to a reasonable level.
Also, allocating 5000 tokens to each admin is very, very unfair. This means that an adminās token share is almost 100 times that of a regular user, or equivalent to 100 regular users. How is this justified?
1 Like
This not acceptable , weāve been with gyro about 3years and now it is not good for us after long time , better to change the allocation.
2 Likes
I read the comments, almost everyone is against this type of distribution. I hope the project managers will respect the opinion of users and increase the share of early users
Hello team
I am writing to propose two changes to the token distribution plan to ensure fairness within the community:
Increase Testnet Usersā Allocation: The allocation for testnet users should be increased from 1% to 5%.
Reduce moderators Tokens: The allocation for moderators, specifically managers, should be reduced from 5,000 tokens to a maximum of 300 tokens.
It seems highly inequitable that testnet users, who contribute significantly, receive only 1% (equivalent to approximately 40 tokens), while Discord moderators are allocated over 100 times more.
To achieve this balance, I suggest redistributing a portion of the moderators tokens and reallocating unused reserves to testnet users. Additionally, introducing performance-based rewards for moderators could justify token distribution while ensuring fairness.
Adjusting these allocations will reflect a more balanced and fair distribution and better reward the contributions of the broader community.
Thank you for considering this proposal. I look forward to your response.
Best regards
Seriously? cant handle this! we, the real users are the early members of Gyro who minted NFTs way before anyone else. Please increase the allocation for NFT holders. 40 token is NOTHING!
I strongly believe that it is unfair allocation, Founding Member NFT holders are early supporter of The gyro projects and have supported the project since it started and participated in different phase of testnet and other campaigns, I think at least 5% is better, I hope this subject will be heard
1 Like
only 1% of the governance token to NFT holders who were with the project through many challenges and stages and made a lot of effort to make it successful is a very small amount after 4 years. thanks for attention
Because gyroscope have a lot of members and userās in discord and X approximately 2 million user and itās so hard for admins to handle this huge members please increase the allocation of moderators to 5 m tokenš
Also those who have 
NFT set 0.01 allocation for them because they bought those NFT for 0.001 eth 3 years ago
It is recommended to increase the NFT holder allocation ratio to 5% to recognize the contributions made by early testers to the project
2 Likes
As a Founding NFT holder, Iām extremely disappointed with the current distribution plan. Given the projectās current stage and the active participation of our community and users in various tests and programs, including the stress test voting program, allocating a mere 1% to NFT holders is deeply inadequate. In contrast, allocating 50,000 units to project moderators is disproportionately high. I propose the following as a more equitable distribution: 5% for Founding NFT members and 10,000 units for moderators. I urge you to seriously reconsider this distribution.
1 Like
like everyone else above, I highly disagree with the proposal. the amount of tokens allocated to NFT holders and Mods is extremely unfair.
I agree with the suggestion of allocating 5% of the tokens to NFT holders and reducing the Modsā share to a maximum of 1000 tokens.
In my opinion, allocating 5% of tokens to OG holders could be done as follows:
- 2% equally among all NFT holders
- 1% for NFT holders based on NFT rarity
- 1% for those NFT holders who also participated in the Stress Test
- 1% for NFT holders who participated in the Spin campaign (distributed based on their rank)
2 Likes