I have some thoughts and questions regarding the current allocation proposal:
First, the “moderator grants” section feels unclear and I’d appreciate more details about it. Were these grants tied to specific proposals or contributions that were reviewed and approved? It seems there might be a misunderstanding here and further clarification could help address concerns.
As I’ve mentioned before, I still believe that 1% for OG users isn’t enough and should be increased. Furthermore, there are many users who didn’t hold NFTs but still contributed meaningfully. I think establishing a minimum share for every eligible user with a minimum level of activity would be a fair way to ensure broader participation is acknowledged. Additionally, I believe more active users should be rewarded; NFT holders who engaged in Spin campaigns, Snapshot voting (or delegated) should be distinguished from those who simply held their NFTs without further involvement and this can help us at least have more rewards for the more active ones, instead of the same share for everyone (although I still believe increasing the base share should remain the first priority).
Lastly, I’d like to know more about the early investors’ token share details. Transparency on this matter would help the community better understand the overall distribution.
By addressing these points, we can work toward a fairer outcome that aligns with the contributions of OGs, active users and the broader Gyroscope community.