Posts & Contributions (7)
[Consultation] Improving Liquidity for GYFI (post #6)
March 24, 2025
If I had to choose, I’d pick PoL because of the reasons you mentioned and others. But most important, this approach would enable us to have more control over the liquidity. Allowing either party to pr
[Consultation] GYFI Incentives and marketing (post #6)
March 06, 2025
I believe this is one of those proposals that will quickly pay for itself. I’ve always been a proponent of increasing liquidity in the protocol, it’s a win-win for both users and the DAO. It strengthe
[Consultation] - Budget for Gyroscope DAO service providers (post #14)
December 24, 2024
I will happily say yes. I am extremely happy with marketing, but I think trading firms are even more impactful. As @PanCake , @emzod ,and @Zen_Dragon mentioned, we should also focus on developing a co
[Consultation] GYFI governance token distribution date, Founding Members and more (post #14)
December 16, 2024
As PanCake mentioned, the ratio to SPIN is fairly comparable. However, I believe the ratio should lean more heavily toward the Founding Frog NFT side—perhaps by 3–5%. In today’s crypto ecosystem, most
[Consultation] Setting a conversion rate for SPIN to GYFI (post #20)
November 05, 2024
I think this approach effectively rewards people who have backed their commitment with their money, while also ensuring that shares are not diluted in a way that could lead to dumping on the protocol
[Consultation] Setting a conversion rate for SPIN to GYFI (post #39)
November 29, 2024
On your point of increase of SPIN cap.(I don’t necessarily disagree with you, just want to state my opinion on that.) I honestly like the way SPIN is going to go forward. How many governance coins has
[Consultation] End-to-end governance test and launch of AMO pool with 200k GYD on Base (post #16)
October 17, 2024
Big fan of expanding on L2s, capture as much liquidity as Gyro can.