📦 Gyroscope Governance Forum Archive — This site is a read-only historical archive. Visit gyro.finance for active links & community channels.
Gyroscope Gyroscope Archive

Gyroscope filters

Closed topics 📅 December 06, 2021 💬 22 posts 👁️ 460 views

Your question is very general. Games are necessary, but not to the extent that they are taken to a hard community and cause discouragement and escape for some.

The only problem with the steps is that they are very slow and tedious :expressionless: :confused: :expressionless:

yes this filter is necessary because this project need to real community

↳ in reply to post #4

I agree. The steps are getting a bit boring. :trident: :trident: :trident:

it can help to separate real people and fake people .but should be some other ways too.

The portion of distributed tokens in lots of projects, are based on just a activity which you are not sure that is that person really eligible for that or not, most of airdrop hunters are waiting for new projects, In my opinion airdrop should be fare, and people should be compensate for their real activity

In my opinion, the best filter is the active presence here and the discord

↳ in reply to post #2

you explained very well man. I couldn’t say nothing. should have replay you. thank you :ok_hand:

Yes, these filters should be put in place to remove multi-accounts and airdrop hunters, but the challenges should be logical and practical.

i think there was better ways
but in their way we are confused by missing out the challenges because we are out of time to do the chalenges

It is true that many people can not be approved in these filters. But I think project administrators want to upgrade their community and get to know different issues.

yes , The main users must be identified to see who is accompanying them to the end of the path

Do you think the filters put in by the gyroscope team (Squid Game) were necessary? Why?[poll type=regular results=always chartType=bar]

  • Yes
  • No
    [/poll]