GM, Exited for another Proposal but I am not entirely sure about the exact purpose of this, as there are insufficient details provided for each section. What needs to be clarified is:
-
Marketing Campaign Budget:
What will happen after approving the proposed budget for marketing campaigns? Will there be another proposal to design and discuss the exact criteria by the DAO, or will it be solely designed by @ftl-labs, as was done previously? -
Trading firms
I assume the trading firms mentioned here refer to market makers, tasked with ensuring sufficient liquidity at TGE. If that is the case, what are the terms of these agreements? Are the tokens allocated through an option contract with a strike price? I believe there should be another proposal providing exact details, similar to the Cowswap DAO Market Maker Agreement Proposal. -
Service Providers:
Who are the service providers, and what are their contributions to the DAO? It would be helpful to have more information about this. Additionally, their token allocation should also be subject to vesting, similar to community tokens.
As I explained above, each section requires further information if decisions are going to be made through the DAO, whether to approve or reject the proposal. I don’t see any valid points in the current proposal, as all three mentioned allocations require dedicated proposals that clearly explain the exact details.